Systematic Comparison between Traditional and Agile Methods Essay

Systematic similarity between Traditional and Agile Methods - Essay ExampleSome do not go through and through on the whole the stages while others may pass through one stage more than once. The Traditional cost involves designing a detailed see before the start of the realise and strictly adhering to it. Therefore, the whole picture is clear to the developers before it is started. Agile project prudence is a collaborative approach in which all the squad members are involved in the project. It involves an iterative process in which managers facilitate the working of the team and it requires regular adaptation to changing situations. The project plan is flexible and is not developed at the starting line of the project. Instead, it is developed throughout the project. The end result of the project is not predictable. This discussion explores the comparison between tralatitious and agile project management approaches. Traditional Project Management Approaches The traditional a pproach to project management consists of five components namely initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and control, closure. Some traditional project management systems hold linear and additive project management lifecycle. Linear project management lifecycle does not kick any changes in the project plan. ... Scheduling the whole project before starting it gives the team a clear picture of what is evaluate to be done and who is responsible for each task. Moreover, details about the resources requirement for the completion of the project are known from the beginning. This approach does not require people with a lot of skills and supervision is not necessary as all the project details are written down. Co-location of team members is not necessary as each person has details of the part he/she is expected to play. It also has disadvantages. This sham does not allow for changes. It is also very costly. It does not produce deliverables until in the late stages of the project. In addition, preparing a complete plan beforehand is time wasting. The process is rigid and there is no going back to make changes. This model is focused on the timely completion of the project within the available budget but not on client look upon (Wysocki 2011). Incremental project management life cycle consists of several hooked increments, each with the lifecycle components of execution, monitoring, and project closure. These increments are accomplished in a prearranged sequence. The characteristics of the incremental project management lifecycle method are similar to those of the linear approach. The deliverables in this model are released against a schedule that is more aggressive. Advantages include the following The business value is produced early and not at the end of the project like in linear approach. This model nominate allow for some changes in the scope of the project. It focuses on the client value more than the linear approach. It also facilitates the scheduli ng of few resources better. Some disadvantages include the following Team members can be lost in between increments. It